Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01114
Original file (BC 2014 01114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-01114
		
			COUNSEL:  

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Separation Program Designation (SPD) code, Reentry (RE) code 
and Narrative Reason for Separation on her DD Form 214, 
Certificate of Release or Discharge, be corrected to reflect:

a.	SPD code:  “JFF”

b.	RE code: “1J”

c.	Narrative Reason for Separation: “Secretarial Authority”.



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was honorably discharged under “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” 
(DADT) in 1997.  

In a 10 page brief, the applicant's counsel makes the following 
key contentions:  

	Since the time of discharge, the Department of the Defense 
(DoD) has repealed DADT and has opened the military service to 
qualified gay, lesbian and bisexual recruits, as well as those 
discharged under the former policy.  

	The applicant’s improper discharge paperwork, she is now in 
the untenable position of having suffered discharge under DADT 
without the appropriate narrative reason, separation code and 
reentry code that would allow her to apply for reenlistment.   

	The applicant does not want to repeatedly explain, for fear 
rejection because her DD Form 214 reflects a policy that has 
since been repealed. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.



STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 3 Jan 
96.  

On 8 Dec 97, the applicant’s commander recommended her for 
discharge for homosexual conduct in accordance with AFI 36-3208, 
Administrative Separation of Airmen, Chapter 5, Section G, 
paragraphs 5.36.1 and 5.36.2.1.

On 15 Dec 97, the Discharge Authority approved an administrative 
discharge with a service characterization of Honorable. 

On 19 Dec 97, the applicant was furnished an Honorable 
discharge, and was credited with 1 year, 11 months, and 17 days 
of active service.  

The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects a Separation Code of “HRA”, 
Reentry Code “2C” and Narrative Reason for Separation 
“Homosexual Act”.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are described 
in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C and D.



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends the Board approve the narrative reason for 
separation change to reflect “Secretarial Authority” and SPD 
code change to reflect “JFF”.  Although the discharge was 
properly processed according to the applicable regulations, the 
applicant’s discharge record indicates the discharge was based 
solely on DADT and did not involve aggravating factors.  The 
absence of aggravating factors is evidenced by the discharge 
authority granting the applicant an Honorable discharge service 
characterization.  
 
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSOA recommends the Board approve the Reentry code change 
to “1J”.  On 10 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense issued 
guidance to repeal DADT.  The guidance stated requests to change 
the RE code to “1J” should be granted for members separated 
under DADT or similar policy that did not involve aggravating 
factors.  A thorough review of the applicant’s record did not 
reveal any aggravating factors.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D.



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant and counsel on 29 Sep 14 for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit E).  As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office.



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting 
relief.  The applicant is requesting her discharge be upgraded 
to honorable based on the repeal of DADT.  No evidence has been 
presented which would lead us to believe her discharge was 
improper or contrary to the directive under which it was 
effected at the time of his separation.  However, in light of 
the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) and the applicant’s 
record of performance, it would be appropriate to upgrade her 
discharge to honorable.  In a memorandum, dated 20 Sep 11, the 
Under Secretary of Defense published guidance that Service 
Discharge Review Boards should normally grant requests to re-
characterize the discharge to honorable if the following 
conditions are met:  (1) the original discharge was based solely 
on DADT or a similar policy in place prior to enactment of DADT 
and (2) there were no aggravating factors in the record, such as 
misconduct.  Based on our review of the evidence of record, the 
applicant’s discharge meets these requirements.  Therefore, we 
recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated 
below.


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 
19 December 1997, she was issued an Honorable discharge with a 
separation code of “JFF”, reentry code of “1J”, narrative reason 
for separation of “Secretarial Authority” and was furnished an 
Honorable Discharge certificate.




The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01114 in Executive Session on 16 Feb 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Mar 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 30 Apr 14.
	Exhibit D.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 2 Jun 14.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Sep 14.

						





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00438

    Original file (BC 2014 00438.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00438 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “HRB” (homosexual conduct-statement) and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge) be changed to allow her to rejoin the Air Force. Although the discharge was properly processed according to the applicable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03062

    Original file (BC 2014 03062.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense issued guidance pertaining to correction of military records requests resulting from the repeal of Title 10, Section 654, commonly known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT).” Effective 20 Sept 11, Service DRBs should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for a discharge (the change should be “Secretarial Authority” (Separation Program Designator Code (SPD) code JFF)), requests to re-characterize the discharge to honorable,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05269

    Original file (BC 2013 05269.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense issued guidance pertaining to correction of military records requests resulting from the repeal of Title 10, Section 654, commonly known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT).” In a memorandum, dated 20 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense published guidance that Service Discharge Review Boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge (the change should be to “Secretarial Authority”), requests to re-characterize the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03324

    Original file (BC-2012-03324.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03324 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Airman First Class (A1C), instead of Airman Basic (AB). His rank at the time of his discharge was not affected by his discharge under DADT. A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05537

    Original file (BC 2013 05537.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the discharge was properly processed according to the applicable regulation at the time, the applicant's discharge record indicates that her discharge was based solely on DADT and did not involve aggravating factors. In light of the repeal of DADT and in accordance with the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) guidance memorandum, Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, United States Code, dated 20 September 2011, Discharge Review...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00088

    Original file (BC 2014 00088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00088 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation on his on his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect “Secretarial Authority,” instead of “homosexual conduct.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was discharged on the basis of unfounded accusations of homosexual conduct and his discharge did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01955

    Original file (BC 2014 01955.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01955 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be updated to Honorable. The guidance stated requests to change the RE code to “1J” should be granted for member’s separated under DADT unless there was misconduct present. In a memorandum, dated 20 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense published guidance that Service Discharge Review Boards should...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00894

    Original file (BC 2014 00894.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00894 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. In a memorandum, dated 20 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense published guidance that Service Discharge Review Boards should normally grant requests to re- characterize the discharge to honorable if the following conditions are met: (1)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03084

    Original file (BC 2012 03084.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His narrative reason for separation was “Homosexual – Acts.” In a letter to the applicant dated 24 Aug 2012, addressing correction of his DD Form 214, AFPC/DPSOR advised the applicant that due to regulations, they cannot amend the DD Form 214 to add the John L. Levitow Honor Graduate award. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C,D, and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01860

    Original file (BC 2014 01860.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete JA evaluation is at Exhibit E. AFPC/DPSID states that should the Board change the applicant's service characterization to "Honorable” they recommend approval of the applicant’s request for award of the AFGCM with one Bronze Loop. The Good Conduct Medal is awarded to enlisted members who have honorably completed three continuous years of active military service subsequent to 26 Aug 40, and who are recommended by their commanding officers for exemplary behavior, efficiency,...